Thanks Carol. It would be a fun tactile experience, especially with your eyes closed!
I don’t know how to advise you on the “read more” section issue. In fact I’m wondering how you managed to make a comment on this post without it, as it’s the “read more” link that opens up the comment box–at least on my phone anyway.
On my laptop, clicking on Leave a Comment opens the full post & comments box.
I think the “More” link doesn’t “work” because the post is not long enough to be clipped. Therefore, there isn’t “more” to display.
Just guessing….
Just to be clear, I never see just a “more” link, it’s always “Read More”. And, in my case, on my desktop computer as well as on my phone, the initial page for a POTD post there is always a “Read More” link below the post. If I click on it, I see any comments followed by a “Leave a comment” box to make comments. If there are no comments yet, then just the comment box shows up. Also, to my knowledge the actual POTD post I make is never clipped when long. Instead I just scroll down the page to see the content, which is then followed by the always present “Read More” link.
I hadn’t notice that but I clearly see the frog (or guy) with a stoggie now. And now that I’ve seen it, it’s something I won’t be able to unsee. Funny how that works. Seeing faces in inanimate objects is called pareidolia I am told. (Thanks Kathy E.) and it’s possibly has an evolutionary origin.
The brain’s face‑detection circuitry is tuned to minimize false negatives, not false positives. Why? Missing a real face (predator, rival, ally, infant) could mean death, loss of offspring, or loss of social advantage. Seeing a face where none exists costs essentially nothing—maybe a moment of attention. Natural selection therefore pushes the system toward hypervigilance. You end up with a detector that fires early and often. (Thanks AI.)
Certainly those false positives costs essentially nothing, but more importantly in the current context, they have the advantage of providing fodder for POTD subjects!
Ooooh! I like it!
The texture invites one to gently slide their hand over the log, bumps and all. A tactile experience.
BTW, still can’t open the “more” section.
Thanks Carol. It would be a fun tactile experience, especially with your eyes closed!
I don’t know how to advise you on the “read more” section issue. In fact I’m wondering how you managed to make a comment on this post without it, as it’s the “read more” link that opens up the comment box–at least on my phone anyway.
On my laptop, clicking on Leave a Comment opens the full post & comments box.
I think the “More” link doesn’t “work” because the post is not long enough to be clipped. Therefore, there isn’t “more” to display.
Just guessing….
Just to be clear, I never see just a “more” link, it’s always “Read More”. And, in my case, on my desktop computer as well as on my phone, the initial page for a POTD post there is always a “Read More” link below the post. If I click on it, I see any comments followed by a “Leave a comment” box to make comments. If there are no comments yet, then just the comment box shows up. Also, to my knowledge the actual POTD post I make is never clipped when long. Instead I just scroll down the page to see the content, which is then followed by the always present “Read More” link.
I see a guy or a frog with a stoggie in his mouth.
I hadn’t notice that but I clearly see the frog (or guy) with a stoggie now. And now that I’ve seen it, it’s something I won’t be able to unsee. Funny how that works. Seeing faces in inanimate objects is called pareidolia I am told. (Thanks Kathy E.) and it’s possibly has an evolutionary origin.
The brain’s face‑detection circuitry is tuned to minimize false negatives, not false positives. Why? Missing a real face (predator, rival, ally, infant) could mean death, loss of offspring, or loss of social advantage. Seeing a face where none exists costs essentially nothing—maybe a moment of attention. Natural selection therefore pushes the system toward hypervigilance. You end up with a detector that fires early and often. (Thanks AI.)
Certainly those false positives costs essentially nothing, but more importantly in the current context, they have the advantage of providing fodder for POTD subjects!